Remember, in a recent past, the IAEA visited the Iraqi’s so call nuclear sites and built what will stay in the history as one of the biggest and dramatic lie of our times. The consequences of this criminal lie was a vain war, the destruction of a beautiful and a powerful country : Iraq and the hanging of its Head of State, Saddam Hussein. The IAEA constantly confirmed that Iraq were hiding nuke sites and, until now, we haven’t heard of the IAEA excuses toward the Iraqi’s people for that masterpiece of diplomatic and military lie. We shall call it The Great Lie.

This criminal process of the IAEA is the same going on with Iran. Actually, is Iran out of the legal level enriching its uranium ; that is to say more than 5% ? Jimmy Carter answered the question and say NO. While in France at the invitation of President Sarkozy, Syrian President, explained in a French network interview that : "For medical purposes, the enrichment of the uranium is up to 20 %. For military purposes, this enrichment jumps to plus 90 %. Iran enrichment is up to 5 %". So where is the emergency Western countries heading the IAEA are pointing out ? Someone is lying in the process.

For the IAEA, Iran is the liar. Syrian President’s statement concerning the level of the Iran’s nuclear enrichment is saying the contrary. From the past inspections of the IAEA in Iraq, we can’t fully trust the IAEA. All the same, from the west side meddling in Iran’s presidential’s elections supporting any opponents of the current President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, we can’t trust western powers heading the IAEA.

Denuclearisation is a pretext to keep an upper hand on Iran’s matters

What is for sure is that Moussavi was the western choice and had he won the presidential bid, the bad movie condemning Iran’s nuclear program would not have taken place. The West side didn’t succeed interferring with Iranian presidential election aiming to pave the way for a successful Moussavi. Now it looks as if the same West side is taking a revenge on Ahmadinejad and will do anything in manipulating Iranian people and politics. This is a colonialist process : trying to impose a leader on another country ; the next step being a co-running of the State.

To those who argue : “look Iran is a dictatorship ; a military regime non reliable. The world can’t tolerate a Nuclear Iran”, we may ask “what about a Pakistan, an Idian and an Israeli Nuclear power ? Who is the one to prejudge who is to be a nuclear power and who is not ? Either every country is eligible to the nuclear power or neither is”.

If the objective is denuclearization, the perspective of this requires a different approach where all the countries should be opened to the IAEA inspections and really inspected so that we don’t have to guess whether Israel possesses a nuclear bomb or not, for example.

Sovereignty and secret defense are constitutional principles. Russia and France have nothing to do with the Iranian civil program.

Anyway, we can agree on the non proliferation ideology. What about the enrichment for civil and medical purposes which is up to 20 % and forbidden to Iran ? Why is it that the international community wants Iran to enrich its uranium out of Iran ? Why Russia and France ? We all know that Iran and France have had strong words each other in June Iran’s presidential election and after the UN General Assembly. President Nicolas Sarkozy publicly accused Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during the presidential running of cheating and fraud. Which is something of a great importance at that stage, considering the fact that this is the kind of allegations the French President could not testify.

As far as sovereignty is concerned, no country should have such a upper hand on another one. If secret defense exists in every state, then Iran deserves the same right of secrecy otherwise it is amazing to talk about sovereignty which is a constitutional law. By the way, violating the sovereignty of a country is a criminal act. Iran deserves the right to go on with its nuclear civil program inside its borders. Russia and France have nothing to do with the Iranian civil program. This is an unacceptable agreement. We must end colonialism in the international institutions like IAEA, IMF, World Bank, WTO, in the Security Council with the veto right which is an abusive one.

Russia and France are they enriching their own uranium elsewhere ? NO. Actually, Russia and France are trying to regain their lost leadership in the world – concerning Russia – and in Europe – for France. Why not UK or Australia or China ? The fact is enriching Iran uranium is so important for France to keep its falling leading position on world diplomatic’s issues. Why is France the only European country for the job ?

Meanwhile, racism and discriminations in France have come to part the country into two opposite blocs. France should be inspired to resolve its internal matters instead of looking for a leading position which has come down. Definitely. What is sustainable development ? Teaching Iran how to enrich its uranium or purifying France of its social enduring and lasting inequalities which has become a social cancer in France ?

Russia and France are running in vain after a glorious past

So Russia and France are meddling in the Iran’s uranium enrichment program for their own purposes. They are disqualified for the job. So do the United States which is the eternal supporter of Israel, at any costs. We are all aware of the link between Israel Palestine conflict and the opposition of the others muslims countries of the region toward Israel. In Europe, UK is being criticized as the US follower, eyes firmly closed. Some explained the disqualification of Tony Blair as Europe President because of this following UK instinct after the US. Whenever. Wherever.

The only country detaining the veto right in the Security Council which can be reliable on Iran’s nuclear program, is China. That is why the Obama’s Asia tour was important asking Beijing, Japan and Seoul to give a strong hand to help Iran and North Korea stop their program. The fact is Iran is not North Korea. Iran is an old civilization, older than the US. How can the United States then dispute the responsability of such a great civilization ? Western countries tend to portray themselves as responsible whereas the others are not. This is an insult.

Fortunately, Chinese President, Hu Jintao and the Singapour’s President, Lee Myung-Bak,were keen enough in saying that “All this should be dealt with peacefully”.

In the “clash of civilisations”, Professor Samuel Huttington said that “if the West side had won the leadership of the world, it is not because of their model of civilisation, but because they had developed violence and cruelty in an industrial scale imposing their rules and their values to the rest of the world nolens volens”. That penchant is still up to date. And it goes with corruption either in aid, on industrial assistance or on trade negociations and on imposing international sanctions by international colonialists institutions we have listed before.

The Arab league is voiceless in supporting Iran. The same way they have abandoned the Palestinian fight for a State. Mahmoud Abbas had underlined that treason of the Arab countries announcing his possible retreat from the electing course of the Palestinian Authority.

Ahmadinejad touring South American countries. Brazil President, Lula da Silva supports Iran’s Nuclear program

End of the article here...

By Elise Mbock, Doctor in Sciences of Communication - official website : scenepublique.com

Postcolonialism : the missing link of Accra speech